linux-kernel - Re: How to handle quirky behavior with boards.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170315173307.jto2aewhhu6s56zy@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:33:07 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Olliver Schinagl <o.schinagl@...imaker.com>
Cc:     dev <dev@...ux-sunxi.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        oliver+list@...inagl.nl, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: How to handle quirky behavior with boards.

On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 04:31:43PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:

> So my question is, what is there against moving some of the constrants
> before the always-on, so that the enable can atleast function properly
> according to its parameters?

No, and in general please don't ask to send patches - just send patches
with any explanation/discussion in the cover letter and/or commit log.
That tends to make things go faster as the code can make any issues more
obvious and if there's no problem then patches can just be applied
immediately.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)