[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRbkM_fZqqSMxP3L8pU3HOPPsKgHoj2QmuR2-gbK0oP+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:48:07 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] audit: log module name on delete_module
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com> wrote:
> +++ Paul Moore [13/03/17 10:16 -0400]:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> When a sysadmin wishes to monitor module unloading with a syscall rule
>>> such as:
>>> -a always,exit -F arch=x86_64 -S delete_module -F key=mod-unload
>>> the SYSCALL record doesn't tell us what module was requested for
>>> unloading.
>>>
>>> Use the new KERN_MODULE auxiliary record to record it.
>>> The SYSCALL record result code will list the return code.
>>>
>>> See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/37
>>> https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/7
>>>
>>> https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/wiki/RFE-Module-Load-Record-Format
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>> kernel/module.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> Jessica? If there are no objections to this patch on your side I'll
>> merge this into the audit/next tree.
>
>
> Looks good to me:
>
> Acked-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
Merged, thanks everyone.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists