linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 10/14] block, bfq: add Early Queue Merge (EQM)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9f8530b9-b73b-b6b9-0bb2-f45878d8c2fb@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:01:05 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>,
        Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-Kernal <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, broonie@...nel.org,
        Mauro Andreolini <mauro.andreolini@...more.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/14] block, bfq: add Early Queue Merge (EQM)

On 03/15/2017 11:02 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> 
>> Il giorno 15 mar 2017, alle ore 17:56, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> ha scritto:
>>
>> On 03/04/2017 09:01 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> @@ -6330,7 +7012,41 @@ static void bfq_rq_enqueued(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
>>>
>>> static void __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq)
>>> {
>>> -	struct bfq_queue *bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(rq);
>>> +	struct bfq_queue *bfqq = RQ_BFQQ(rq), *new_bfqq;
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * An unplug may trigger a requeue of a request from the device
>>> +	 * driver: make sure we are in process context while trying to
>>> +	 * merge two bfq_queues.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (!in_interrupt()) {
>>
>> What's the reason for this?
> 
> None :(
> 
> Just pre-existing, working code that I did not update, sorry.

OK good, then that check can simply be killed.

-- 
Jens Axboe