[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0UfwxL4tG+XJAsqx+AW_LtMuLCqYZYh+uJXRnYN13MTXJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:38:39 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 5/5] epoll: Add busy poll support to epoll with
socket fds.
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 11:33 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> From: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
>
>> +/*
>> + * If busy polling is on and the file is a socket, return a pointer to
>> + * struct sock
>> + */
>> +static inline struct sock *ep_sk_from_file(struct file *file)
>> +{
>> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
>> +
>> + if (!S_ISSOCK(inode->i_mode))
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + return ((struct socket *)file->private_data)->sk;
>> +}
>
> I believe a more standard way is to use sock_from_file()
>
> (This does not have to fetch a cache line to read i_mode ))
Thanks. Will make sure to update to use that for v2.
- Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists