[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ffd0881-9076-04b0-62bf-85b02dd7bbf3@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:59:51 +0200
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: <paul@...an.com>, <bcousson@...libre.com>, <t-kristo@...com>,
<nsekhar@...com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: OMAP2+ hwmod: Allow modules to disable HW_AUTO
Tony,
On 14/03/17 17:48, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com> [170313 04:55]:
>
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
>> @@ -2149,7 +2149,7 @@ static int _idle(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
>> _idle_sysc(oh);
>> _del_initiator_dep(oh, mpu_oh);
>>
>> - if (oh->clkdm)
>> + if (oh->clkdm && !(oh->flags & HWMOD_CLKDM_NOAUTO))
>> clkdm_deny_idle(oh->clkdm);
>>
>> if (oh->flags & HWMOD_BLOCK_WFI)
>
> Is this change to _idle() really needed? It seems that the
> clkdm_deny_idle() there is paired with the clkdm_allow_idle()
> later on in the same function?
>
You are right. This change to _idle() is unnecessary. I'll send an update.
--
cheers,
-roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists