lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4fda8fbe-2c65-196e-81ea-fff513a17f11@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:27:03 +0100
From:   Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 21/33] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE irq domain
 allocation/teardown

Hi,

On 17/01/2017 11:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> When creating a VM, the low level GICv4 code is responsible for:
> - allocating each VPE a unique VPEID
> - allocating a doorbell interrupt for each VPE
> - allocating the pending tables for each VPE
> - allocating the property table for the VM
> 
> This of course has to be reversed when the VM is brought down.
> 
> All of this is wired into the irq domain alloc/free methods.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 174 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index ddd8096..54d0075 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ static struct rdists *gic_rdists;
>  static struct irq_domain *its_parent;
>  
>  static unsigned long its_list_map;
> +static DEFINE_IDA(its_vpeid_ida);
>  
>  #define gic_data_rdist()		(raw_cpu_ptr(gic_rdists->rdist))
>  #define gic_data_rdist_rd_base()	(gic_data_rdist()->rd_base)
> @@ -1146,6 +1147,11 @@ static struct page *its_allocate_prop_table(gfp_t gfp_flags)
>  	return prop_page;
>  }
>  
> +static void its_free_prop_table(struct page *prop_page)
> +{
> +	free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(prop_page),
> +		   get_order(LPI_PROPBASE_SZ));
> +}
>  
>  static int __init its_alloc_lpi_tables(void)
>  {
> @@ -1444,6 +1450,12 @@ static struct page *its_allocate_pending_table(gfp_t gfp_flags)
>  	return pend_page;
>  }
>  
> +static void its_free_pending_table(struct page *pt)
> +{
> +	free_pages((unsigned long)page_address(pt),
> +		   get_order(max(LPI_PENDBASE_SZ, SZ_64K)));
> +}
> +
>  static void its_cpu_init_lpis(void)
>  {
>  	void __iomem *rbase = gic_data_rdist_rd_base();
> @@ -1666,6 +1678,34 @@ static bool its_alloc_device_table(struct its_node *its, u32 dev_id)
>  	return its_alloc_table_entry(baser, dev_id);
>  }
>  
> +static bool its_alloc_vpe_table(u32 vpe_id)
> +{
> +	struct its_node *its;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Make sure the L2 tables are allocated on *all* v4 ITSs. We
> +	 * could try and only do it on ITSs corresponding to devices
> +	 * that have interrupts targeted at this VPE, but the
> +	 * complexity becomes crazy (and you have tons of memory
> +	 * anyway, right?).
> +	 */
> +	list_for_each_entry(its, &its_nodes, entry) {
> +		struct its_baser *baser;
> +
> +		if (!its->is_v4)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		baser = its_get_baser(its, GITS_BASER_TYPE_VCPU);
> +		if (!baser)
> +			return false;

don't you need to check the vpe_id doesn't overshoot the BASER caps?
> +
> +		if (!its_alloc_table_entry(baser, vpe_id))
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static struct its_device *its_create_device(struct its_node *its, u32 dev_id,
>  					    int nvecs)
>  {
> @@ -1922,7 +1962,141 @@ static struct irq_chip its_vpe_irq_chip = {
>  	.name			= "GICv4-vpe",
>  };
>  
> +static int its_vpe_id_alloc(void)
> +{
> +	return ida_simple_get(&its_vpeid_ida, 0, 1 << 16, GFP_KERNEL);
> +}
> +
> +static void its_vpe_id_free(u16 id)
> +{
> +	ida_simple_remove(&its_vpeid_ida, id);
> +}
> +
> +static int its_vpe_init(struct its_vpe *vpe)
> +{
> +	struct page *vpt_page;
> +	int vpe_id;
> +
> +	/* Allocate vpe_id */
> +	vpe_id = its_vpe_id_alloc();
> +	if (vpe_id < 0)
> +		return vpe_id;
> +
> +	/* Allocate VPT */
> +	vpt_page = its_allocate_pending_table(GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (vpt_page) {
isn't it !vpt_page?
> +		its_vpe_id_free(vpe_id);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!its_alloc_vpe_table(vpe_id)) {
> +		its_vpe_id_free(vpe_id);
> +		its_free_pending_table(vpe->vpt_page);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	vpe->vpe_id = vpe_id;
> +	vpe->vpt_page = vpt_page;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void its_vpe_teardown(struct its_vpe *vpe)
> +{
> +	its_vpe_id_free(vpe->vpe_id);
> +	its_free_pending_table(vpe->vpt_page);
don't you need to remove the VPE entry as well?
> +}
> +
> +static int its_vpe_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
> +				    unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
> +{
> +	msi_alloc_info_t *info = args;
> +	struct its_vpe **vpes = info->scratchpad[0].ptr;
> +	struct its_vm *vm = vpes[0]->its_vm;
> +	unsigned long *bitmap;
> +	struct page *vprop_page;
> +	int base, nr_ids, i, err = 0;
> +
> +	bitmap = its_lpi_alloc_chunks(nr_irqs, &base, &nr_ids);
> +	if (!bitmap)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (nr_ids < nr_irqs) {
> +		its_lpi_free_chunks(bitmap, base, nr_ids);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	vprop_page = its_allocate_prop_table(GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!vprop_page) {
> +		its_lpi_free_chunks(bitmap, base, nr_ids);
> +		return ENOMEM;
-ENOMEM
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> +		vpes[i]->vpe_db_lpi = base + i;
> +		err = its_vpe_init(vpes[i]);
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +		irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain,
> +					      virq + i, vpes[i]->vpe_db_lpi,
> +					      &its_vpe_irq_chip, vpes[i]);
> +		set_bit(i, bitmap);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (err) {
> +		while (--i >= 0) {
> +			its_vpe_teardown(vpes[i]);
> +			clear_bit(i, bitmap);
> +		}
> +
> +		its_lpi_free_chunks(bitmap, base, nr_ids);
> +		its_free_prop_table(vprop_page);
> +
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +
> +	vm->db_bitmap = bitmap;
> +	vm->db_lpi_base = base;
> +	vm->nr_db_lpis = nr_ids;
> +	vm->vprop_page = vprop_page;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void its_vpe_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
> +				    unsigned int virq,
> +				    unsigned int nr_irqs)
> +{
> +	struct its_vm *vm = NULL;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> +		struct irq_data *data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
> +		struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> +		BUG_ON(vm && vm != vpe->its_vm);
> +		if (!vm)
> +			vm = vpe->its_vm;
I don't get the above. actually I missed who does set its_vm field on
the vpe.

Thanks

Eric
> +
> +		clear_bit(vpe->vpe_db_lpi - vm->db_lpi_base, vm->db_bitmap);
> +		its_vpe_teardown(vpe);
> +		irq_domain_reset_irq_data(data);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!vm)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (bitmap_empty(vm->db_bitmap, vm->nr_db_lpis)) {
> +		its_lpi_free_chunks(vm->db_bitmap, vm->db_lpi_base, vm->nr_db_lpis);
> +		its_free_prop_table(vm->vprop_page);
> +	}
> +
> +	irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct irq_domain_ops its_vpe_domain_ops = {
> +	.alloc			= its_vpe_irq_domain_alloc,
> +	.free			= its_vpe_irq_domain_free,
>  };
>  
>  static int its_force_quiescent(void __iomem *base)
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ