[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05dbd756-e8e9-9384-2759-898e230a6909@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 12:03:52 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>, simon.guinot@...uanux.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, gary.hook@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, hpa@...or.com, cl@...ux.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, bhe@...hat.com, xemul@...allels.com,
joro@...tes.org, x86@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
piotr.luc@...el.com, mingo@...hat.com, msalter@...hat.com,
ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, bp@...e.de, dyoung@...hat.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, jroedel@...e.de, keescook@...omium.org,
arnd@...db.de, toshi.kani@....com, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
luto@...nel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mchehab@...nel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
labbott@...oraproject.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
alexandre.bounine@....com, kuleshovmail@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mcgrof@...nel.org, mst@...hat.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 30/32] kvm: svm: Add support for SEV DEBUG_ENCRYPT
command
On 02/03/2017 16:18, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> + data = (void *) get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
The page does not need to be zeroed, does it?
> +
> + if ((len & 15) || (dst_addr & 15)) {
> + /* if destination address and length are not 16-byte
> + * aligned then:
> + * a) decrypt destination page into temporary buffer
> + * b) copy source data into temporary buffer at correct offset
> + * c) encrypt temporary buffer
> + */
> + ret = __sev_dbg_decrypt_page(kvm, dst_addr, data, &argp->error);
Ah, I see now you're using this function here for read-modify-write.
data is already pinned here, so even if you keep the function it makes
sense to push pinning out of __sev_dbg_decrypt_page and into
sev_dbg_decrypt.
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_3;
> + d_off = dst_addr & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(data + d_off,
> + (uint8_t *)debug.src_addr, len)) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto err_3;
> + }
> +
> + encrypt->length = PAGE_SIZE;
Why decrypt/re-encrypt all the page instead of just the 16 byte area
around the [dst_addr, dst_addr+len) range?
> + encrypt->src_addr = __psp_pa(data);
> + encrypt->dst_addr = __sev_page_pa(inpages[0]);
> + } else {
> + if (copy_from_user(data, (uint8_t *)debug.src_addr, len)) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto err_3;
> + }
Do you need copy_from_user, or can you just pin/unpin memory as for
DEBUG_DECRYPT?
Paolo
> + d_off = dst_addr & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> + encrypt->length = len;
> + encrypt->src_addr = __psp_pa(data);
> + encrypt->dst_addr = __sev_page_pa(inpages[0]);
> + encrypt->dst_addr += d_off;
> + }
> +
> + encrypt->handle = sev_get_handle(kvm);
> + ret = sev_issue_cmd(kvm, SEV_CMD_DBG_ENCRYPT, encrypt, &argp->error);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists