[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170316113056.GG464@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 20:30:56 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: page_alloc: Reduce object size by neatening
printks
On (03/15/17 18:43), Joe Perches wrote:
[..]
> - printk("active_anon:%lu inactive_anon:%lu isolated_anon:%lu\n"
> - " active_file:%lu inactive_file:%lu isolated_file:%lu\n"
> - " unevictable:%lu dirty:%lu writeback:%lu unstable:%lu\n"
> - " slab_reclaimable:%lu slab_unreclaimable:%lu\n"
> - " mapped:%lu shmem:%lu pagetables:%lu bounce:%lu\n"
> - " free:%lu free_pcp:%lu free_cma:%lu\n",
> - global_node_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_ANON),
> - global_node_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_ANON),
> - global_node_page_state(NR_ISOLATED_ANON),
> - global_node_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_FILE),
> - global_node_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_FILE),
> - global_node_page_state(NR_ISOLATED_FILE),
> - global_node_page_state(NR_UNEVICTABLE),
> - global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY),
> - global_node_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK),
> - global_node_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS),
> - global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE),
> - global_page_state(NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE),
> - global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_MAPPED),
> - global_node_page_state(NR_SHMEM),
> - global_page_state(NR_PAGETABLE),
> - global_page_state(NR_BOUNCE),
> - global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES),
> - free_pcp,
> - global_page_state(NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES));
> + printk("active_anon:%lu inactive_anon:%lu isolated_anon:%lu\n",
> + global_node_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_ANON),
> + global_node_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_ANON),
> + global_node_page_state(NR_ISOLATED_ANON));
> + printk("active_file:%lu inactive_file:%lu isolated_file:%lu\n",
> + global_node_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_FILE),
> + global_node_page_state(NR_INACTIVE_FILE),
> + global_node_page_state(NR_ISOLATED_FILE));
> + printk("unevictable:%lu dirty:%lu writeback:%lu unstable:%lu\n",
> + global_node_page_state(NR_UNEVICTABLE),
> + global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY),
> + global_node_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK),
> + global_node_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS));
> + printk("slab_reclaimable:%lu slab_unreclaimable:%lu\n",
> + global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE),
> + global_page_state(NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE));
> + printk("mapped:%lu shmem:%lu pagetables:%lu bounce:%lu\n",
> + global_node_page_state(NR_FILE_MAPPED),
> + global_node_page_state(NR_SHMEM),
> + global_page_state(NR_PAGETABLE),
> + global_page_state(NR_BOUNCE));
> + printk("free:%lu free_pcp:%lu free_cma:%lu\n",
> + global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES),
> + free_pcp,
> + global_page_state(NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES));
a side note:
this can make it harder to read, in _the worst case_. one printk()
guaranteed that we would see a single line in the serial log/etc.
the sort of a problem with multiple printks is that printks coming
from other CPUs will split that "previously single" line.
just a notice. up to MM people to decide.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists