linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 02/35] USB: serial: digi_acceleport: fix OOB-event processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170316142906.895165657@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:29:21 +0900
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 02/35] USB: serial: digi_acceleport: fix OOB-event processing

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>

commit 2e46565cf622dd0534a9d8bffe152a577b48d7aa upstream.

A recent change claimed to fix an off-by-one error in the OOB-port
completion handler, but instead introduced such an error. This could
specifically led to modem-status changes going unnoticed, effectively
breaking TIOCMGET.

Note that the offending commit fixes a loop-condition underflow and is
marked for stable, but should not be backported without this fix.

Reported-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Fixes: 2d380889215f ("USB: serial: digi_acceleport: fix OOB data sanity
check")
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/usb/serial/digi_acceleport.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/serial/digi_acceleport.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/digi_acceleport.c
@@ -1492,7 +1492,7 @@ static int digi_read_oob_callback(struct
 		return -1;
 
 	/* handle each oob command */
-	for (i = 0; i < urb->actual_length - 4; i += 4) {
+	for (i = 0; i < urb->actual_length - 3; i += 4) {
 		opcode = buf[i];
 		line = buf[i + 1];
 		status = buf[i + 2];