[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALZtONDmZ0PVHaRt5nX1Zipx0poMLiHCcmUq4wRbWW77ptHoWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:54:43 -0400
From: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Mahipal Reddy <mahipalreddy2006@...il.com>,
Mahipal Challa <Mahipal.Challa@...ium.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pathreya@...ium.com,
Vishnu Nair <Vishnu.Nair@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: zswap - Add crypto acomp/scomp framework support
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 12:38:40PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote:
>>
>> It looks like the crypto_scomp interface is buried under
>> include/crypto/internal/scompress.h, however that's exactly what zswap
>> should be using. We don't need to switch to an asynchronous interface
>> that's rather significantly more complicated, and then use it in a
>> synchronous way. The crypto_scomp interface should probably be made
>> public, not an implementation internal.
>
> No scomp is not meant to be used externally. We provide exactly
> one compression interface and it's acomp. acomp can be used
> synchronously by setting the CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC bit in the mask
> field when allocating the algorithm.
setting the ASYNC bit makes it synchronous? that seems backwards...?
Anyway, I have a few concerns about moving over to using that first,
specifically:
- no docs on acomp in Documentation/crypto/ that I can see
- no place in the crypto code that I can see that parses ALG_ASYNC to
make the crypto_acomp_compress() call synchronous
- no synchronous test in crypto/testmgr.c
Maybe I'm reading the code wrong, but it looks like any compression
backend that is actually scomp, actually does the (de)compression
synchronously. In crypto_acomp_init_tfm(), if the tfm is not
crypto_acomp_type (and I assume because all the current
implementations register as scomp, they aren't acomp_type) it calls
crypto_init_scomp_ops_async(), which then sets ->compress to
scomp_acomp_compress() and that function appears to directly call the
scomp compression function. This is just after a very quick look, so
maybe I'm reading it wrong. I'll look some more, and also add a
synchronous testmgr test so i can understand how it works better.
Is the acomp interface fully ready for use?
>
> The existing compression interface will be phased out.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
> PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists