linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] tty/serial: sh-sci: remove uneeded IS_ERR_OR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170316163731.xfx7ybtgdadzbh3m@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2017 17:37:31 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Janusz Uzycki <j.uzycki@...roma.com.pl>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] tty/serial: sh-sci: remove uneeded IS_ERR_OR_NULL
 calls

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:18:52PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:53:27AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
> 
> >> > I wouldn't want to code this in each driver (something like:
> >> >
> >> >         if (IS_ENABLED(GPIOLIB) || device_is_instantiated_by_dt(dev) || device_is_instantiated_by_acpi(dev))
> >> >                 gpios = mctrl_gpio_init(...);
> >> >         else
> >> >                 gpios = NULL;
> >> >
> >> > ). Putting this into GPIOLIB is the right approach, and so this is
> >> > another argument for HALFGPIOLIB. This would fix mctrl_gpio_init en
> >> > passant.
> >>
> >> Do we have platforms where DT=y || ACPI=y, but GPIOLIB=n?
> >> Ah, x86 ;-)
> >
> > Yeah, and I think rm -r arch/x86 won't be acceptable :-) I assume you
> > can also configure some arm or powerpc systems without GPIOLIB.
> >
> >> Anyway, for sh-sci.c, platforms either have DT and GPIOLIB, or they do not
> >> need mctrl-gpio.
> >
> > So we're in agreement now that HALFGPIOLIB is the way to go?
> > Linus, what do you think?
> 
> OK modem lines over GPIO.
> 
> So the problem is that GPIOLIB is needed (obviously) for mctrl_gpio_init() to
> work properly, and then there are some stubs in
> drivers/tty/serial/serial_mctrl_gpio.h
> for !GPIOLIB.
> 
> And this whole discussion is all about that !GPIOLIB case really,
> whether DT, ACPI, SFI or board files machine data is used doesn't
> really matter.
> 
> We're talking about:
> 
> > git grep mctrl_gpio_init
> drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c:      atmel_port->gpios =
> mctrl_gpio_init(&atmel_port->uart, 0);
> drivers/tty/serial/clps711x.c:  s->gpios =
> mctrl_gpio_init_noauto(&pdev->dev, 0);
> drivers/tty/serial/etraxfs-uart.c:      up->gpios =
> mctrl_gpio_init_noauto(&pdev->dev, 0);
> drivers/tty/serial/imx.c:       sport->gpios = mctrl_gpio_init(&sport->port, 0);
> drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c: s->gpios = mctrl_gpio_init_noauto(dev, 0);
> drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c:    sciport->gpios =
> mctrl_gpio_init(&sciport->port, 0);
> 
> Atmel, ARM, ETRAX, ARM, ARM, Super-H, all have GPIOLIB.
> Right now no x86, correct?
> 
> They actually all even do things like this in Kconfig:
> 
> config SERIAL_ATMEL
> (...)
>         select SERIAL_MCTRL_GPIO if GPIOLIB
> 
> What stops us from removing all the stubs in
> drivers/tty/serial/serial_mctrl_gpio.h
> and just make SERIAL_MCTRL_GPIO depends on GPIOLIB?

Would be ok for me, too. People seem to object to that though.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |