linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/9] cpufreq: schedutil: Allow remote wakeups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170316030916.GA5201@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2017 08:39:16 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        smuckle.linux@...il.com, juri.lelli@....com,
        Morten.Rasmussen@....com, patrick.bellasi@....com,
        eas-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] cpufreq: schedutil: Allow remote wakeups

On 15-03-17, 12:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From the first quick look patches [1-3/9] seem to be split out somewhat
> artificially.
> 
> Any chance to fold them into the patches where the new stuff is actually used?
> 
> I'll be looking at the rest of the patchset shortly.

I thought it would be better to keep them separate, but I can merge them to
others in the next version if you want.

-- 
viresh