linux-kernel - Re: 'perf test tsc' failing, bisected to "sched/clock: Provide better clock continuity"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:36:17 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 'perf test tsc' failing, bisected to "sched/clock: Provide
 better clock continuity"

Em Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:11:21PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 03:53:11PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:01:03AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > [root@...et ~]# perf test -v tsc
> > > 55: Convert perf time to TSC                   :
> > > Convert perf time to TSC: FAILED!
> > >     sched/clock: Provide better clock continuity

> > Right, ahunter also complained about this. I had a half arsed fugly
> > patch in the works. Let me see if I can improve and finish.
 
> The below seems to cure things for me...

Building...

- Arnaldo