[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170317120855.zwqame63yvy5afhg@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:08:55 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] x86, boot, LLVM: Use regparm=0 for memcpy and memset
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:15:18PM -0700, Michael Davidson wrote:
> Use the standard regparm=0 calling convention for memcpy and
> memset when building with clang.
>
> This is a work around for a long standing clang bug
> (see https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3997) where
> clang always uses the standard regparm=0 calling convention
> for any implcit calls to memcpy and memset that it generates
> (eg for structure assignments and initialization) even if an
> alternate calling convention such as regparm=3 has been specified.
Seriously, fix LLVM already.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists