[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703171416060.3538@nanos>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 14:18:00 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@...eaurora.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
james.morse@....com, will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com
Subject: Re: Schedule affinity_notify work while migrating IRQs during hot
plug
On Fri, 17 Mar 2017, Sodagudi Prasad wrote:
> On 2017-03-13 13:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Can you actually see the difference between these functions? There is a
> > damned good reason WHY this calls irq_do_set_affinity().
>
> Other option is that, adding an argument to irq_do_set_affinity() and queue
> work to notify when that new parameter set. I have attached patch for the
> same.
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst: Section #6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists