[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170317152519.GA8684@amd>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16:25:19 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, lee@...nel.org,
eric@...olt.net, f.fainelli@...il.com, rjui@...adcom.com,
sbranden@...adcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: outreachy
Hi!
>
> Hah! That's the joy of being a maintainer of a driver in staging. Even
> if you filter out outreachy, you are going to get a lot of "basic
> mistakes" and other type patches cc:ed to you.
>
> I strongly suggest, that if you all don't like this type of stuff,
> either:
> - work to get the code out of staging as soon as possible (i.e.
> send me coding style fixes for everything right now, and then
> fix up the rest of the stuff.)
> - take yourself off the maintainer list for this code.
>
> It's your choice, outreachy right now is a lot of patches, but again,
> it's not going to keep you from getting the "basic" stuff sent to you
> in ways that is totally wrong.
Could we get these trivial patches off the lkml? Yes, lkml already has
a lot of traffic, but no, this is not useful :-(.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists