linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohponGNdnd0Q8rEhMAa=M8EiUiEE6H0nkJYFCFCu+Ow3zw2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2017 22:13:13 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Restore policy min/max limits on CPU online

On 17 March 2017 at 22:01, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:

> IMO if we are not going to restore the governor, we also should not
> restore the limits as those things are related.  Now, the governor can
> be unloaded while the CPU is offline.

I thought about it earlier but then governor and policy min/max
looked independent to me. Why do you think they are related?