lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:21:40 +0100
From:   Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...inera.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...inera.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org#v4.9+
Subject: [PATCHv2 2/2] x86: Match bitops prototypes

Building VirtualBox modules causes type mismatch complaints when
mixing void * and unsigned long *.
Adjust bitops function prototypes in asm-generic/bitops/le.h
to match the generic ones in arch/x86/include/asm/le.h
That is, replace void* with unsigned long *

Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.9+
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...inera.com>
---
 v2 - Improve wording

 include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h b/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h
index 6173154..92a3afa 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h
@@ -8,20 +8,22 @@
 
 #define BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE	0
 
-static inline unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr,
-		unsigned long size, unsigned long offset)
+static inline unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const unsigned long *addr,
+                                                  unsigned long size,
+                                                  unsigned long offset)
 {
 	return find_next_zero_bit(addr, size, offset);
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr,
-		unsigned long size, unsigned long offset)
+static inline unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const unsigned long *addr,
+                                             unsigned long size,
+                                             unsigned long offset)
 {
 	return find_next_bit(addr, size, offset);
 }
 
-static inline unsigned long find_first_zero_bit_le(const void *addr,
-		unsigned long size)
+static inline unsigned long find_first_zero_bit_le(const unsigned long *addr,
+                                                   unsigned long size)
 {
 	return find_first_zero_bit(addr, size);
 }
@@ -31,13 +33,15 @@ static inline unsigned long find_first_zero_bit_le(const void *addr,
 #define BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE	((BITS_PER_LONG-1) & ~0x7)
 
 #ifndef find_next_zero_bit_le
-extern unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr,
-		unsigned long size, unsigned long offset);
+extern unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const unsigned long *addr,
+                                           unsigned long size,
+                                           unsigned long offset);
 #endif
 
 #ifndef find_next_bit_le
-extern unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr,
-		unsigned long size, unsigned long offset);
+extern unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const unsigned long *addr,
+                                      unsigned long size,
+                                      unsigned long offset);
 #endif
 
 #ifndef find_first_zero_bit_le
@@ -49,47 +53,47 @@ extern unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr,
 #error "Please fix <asm/byteorder.h>"
 #endif
 
-static inline int test_bit_le(int nr, const void *addr)
+static inline int test_bit_le(int nr, const unsigned long *addr)
 {
 	return test_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline void set_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline void set_bit_le(int nr, unsigned long *addr)
 {
 	set_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline void clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline void clear_bit_le(int nr, unsigned long *addr)
 {
 	clear_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline void __set_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline void __set_bit_le(int nr, unsigned long *addr)
 {
 	__set_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline void __clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline void __clear_bit_le(int nr, unsigned long *addr)
 {
 	__clear_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline int test_and_set_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline int test_and_set_bit_le(int nr, unsigned long *addr)
 {
 	return test_and_set_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline int test_and_clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline int test_and_clear_bit_le(int nr, unsigned long *addr)
 {
 	return test_and_clear_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline int __test_and_set_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline int __test_and_set_bit_le(int nr, unsigned long *addr)
 {
 	return __test_and_set_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
 
-static inline int __test_and_clear_bit_le(int nr, void *addr)
+static inline int __test_and_clear_bit_le(int nr, unsigned long *addr)
 {
 	return __test_and_clear_bit(nr ^ BITOP_LE_SWIZZLE, addr);
 }
-- 
2.10.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ