[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878415e5-7731-1dd8-8609-6d59daef5e15@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:11:59 -0700
From: sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com>
Cc: andy@...radead.org, qipeng.zha@...el.com, dvhart@...radead.org,
david.e.box@...ux.intel.com, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shanth.murthy@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Add pmc gcr
read/write api's
Hi,
On 03/17/2017 04:26 AM, Rajneesh Bhardwaj wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:41:34PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
>> This patch adds API's to read/write PMC GC registers.
>> PMC dependent devices like iTCO_WDT, Telemetry has requirement
>> to acces GCR registers. These API's can be used for this
>> purpose.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h
>> index 4291b6a..017429d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel_pmc_ipc.h
>> @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@
>> #define IPC_ERR_EMSECURITY 6
>> #define IPC_ERR_UNSIGNEDKERNEL 7
>>
>> +/* GCR reg offsets from gcr base*/
>> +#define PMC_GCR_PRSTS_REG 0x00
> remove.
Will remove it in next series.
>
>> +#define PMC_GCR_PMC_CFG_REG 0x08
>> +
>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_PMC_IPC)
>>
>> int intel_pmc_ipc_simple_command(int cmd, int sub);
>> @@ -31,6 +35,8 @@ int intel_pmc_ipc_raw_cmd(u32 cmd, u32 sub, u8 *in, u32 inlen,
>> int intel_pmc_ipc_command(u32 cmd, u32 sub, u8 *in, u32 inlen,
>> u32 *out, u32 outlen);
>> int intel_pmc_s0ix_counter_read(u64 *data);
>> +u32 intel_pmc_gcr_read(u32 offset);
> consider changing the signature to read data as out param and use return
> value for better error handling since exported API can be called from
> anywhere in the kernel.
I can add check to make sure offset is within GCR range.
>
>> +void intel_pmc_gcr_write(u32 offset, u32 data);
> ditto.
Same as above.
>
>>
>> #else
>>
>> @@ -56,6 +62,16 @@ static inline int intel_pmc_s0ix_counter_read(u64 *data)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline u32 intel_pmc_gcr_read(u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
> samew as above.
Same as above.
>
>> +static inline void intel_pmc_gcr_write(u32 offset, u32 data)
>> +{
>> + return;
>> +}
>> +
> ditto.
Same as above.
>
>> #endif /*CONFIG_INTEL_PMC_IPC*/
>>
>> #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
>> index 0a33592..12018f3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_pmc_ipc.c
>> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ static struct intel_pmc_ipc_dev {
>>
>> /* gcr */
>> resource_size_t gcr_base;
>> + void __iomem *gcr_mem_base;
>> int gcr_size;
>> bool has_gcr_regs;
>>
>> @@ -199,6 +200,18 @@ static inline u64 gcr_data_readq(u32 offset)
>> return readq(ipcdev.ipc_base + offset);
>> }
>>
>> +u32 intel_pmc_gcr_read(u32 offset)
>> +{
>> + return readl(ipcdev.gcr_mem_base + offset);
>> +}
> what happens when this is called with a wrong offset on IPC enabled
> platforms?
>
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_pmc_gcr_read);
>> +
>> +void intel_pmc_gcr_write(u32 offset, u32 data)
>> +{
>> + writel(data, ipcdev.gcr_mem_base + offset);
>> +}
> same as above.
>
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_pmc_gcr_write);
>> +
>> static int intel_pmc_ipc_check_status(void)
>> {
>> int status;
>> @@ -747,6 +760,7 @@ static int ipc_plat_get_res(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> ipcdev.ipc_base = addr;
>>
>> ipcdev.gcr_base = res->start + PLAT_RESOURCE_GCR_OFFSET;
>> + ipcdev.gcr_mem_base = addr + PLAT_RESOURCE_GCR_OFFSET;
>> ipcdev.gcr_size = PLAT_RESOURCE_GCR_SIZE;
>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "ipc res: %pR\n", res);
>>
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Android kernel developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists