linux-kernel - [GIT pull] locking fixes for 4.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703171912000.3538@nanos>
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2017 19:16:08 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [GIT pull] locking fixes for 4.11

Linus,

please pull the latest locking-urgent-for-linus git tree from:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git locking-urgent-for-linus

Three fixes related to locking:

  - Fix a SIGKILL issue for RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK which has been fixed for
    the XCHGADD variant already

  - Plug a potential use after free in the futex code

  - Prevent leaking a held spinlock in an futex error handling code path

Thanks,

	tglx

------------------>
Niklas Cassel (1):
      locking/rwsem: Fix down_write_killable() for CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK=y

Peter Zijlstra (2):
      futex: Fix potential use-after-free in FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI
      futex: Add missing error handling to FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI


 kernel/futex.c                  | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 229a744b1781..45858ec73941 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -2815,7 +2815,6 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
 {
 	struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to = NULL;
 	struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter;
-	struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex = NULL;
 	struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
 	union futex_key key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
 	struct futex_q q = futex_q_init;
@@ -2899,6 +2898,8 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
 		if (q.pi_state && (q.pi_state->owner != current)) {
 			spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
 			ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr2, &q, current);
+			if (ret && rt_mutex_owner(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex) == current)
+				rt_mutex_unlock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex);
 			/*
 			 * Drop the reference to the pi state which
 			 * the requeue_pi() code acquired for us.
@@ -2907,6 +2908,8 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
 			spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
 		}
 	} else {
+		struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex;
+
 		/*
 		 * We have been woken up by futex_unlock_pi(), a timeout, or a
 		 * signal.  futex_unlock_pi() will not destroy the lock_ptr nor
@@ -2930,18 +2933,19 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
 		if (res)
 			ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0;
 
+		/*
+		 * If fixup_pi_state_owner() faulted and was unable to handle
+		 * the fault, unlock the rt_mutex and return the fault to
+		 * userspace.
+		 */
+		if (ret && rt_mutex_owner(pi_mutex) == current)
+			rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex);
+
 		/* Unqueue and drop the lock. */
 		unqueue_me_pi(&q);
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * If fixup_pi_state_owner() faulted and was unable to handle the
-	 * fault, unlock the rt_mutex and return the fault to userspace.
-	 */
-	if (ret == -EFAULT) {
-		if (pi_mutex && rt_mutex_owner(pi_mutex) == current)
-			rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex);
-	} else if (ret == -EINTR) {
+	if (ret == -EINTR) {
 		/*
 		 * We've already been requeued, but cannot restart by calling
 		 * futex_lock_pi() directly. We could restart this syscall, but
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
index 7bc24d477805..c65f7989f850 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c
@@ -213,10 +213,9 @@ int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
 		 */
 		if (sem->count == 0)
 			break;
-		if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
-			ret = -EINTR;
-			goto out;
-		}
+		if (signal_pending_state(state, current))
+			goto out_nolock;
+
 		set_current_state(state);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
 		schedule();
@@ -224,12 +223,19 @@ int __sched __down_write_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
 	}
 	/* got the lock */
 	sem->count = -1;
-out:
 	list_del(&waiter.list);
 
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
 
 	return ret;
+
+out_nolock:
+	list_del(&waiter.list);
+	if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
+		__rwsem_do_wake(sem, 1);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
+
+	return -EINTR;
 }
 
 void __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)