lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703172005400.3790@nanos>
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2017 20:09:24 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [GIT pull] scheduler fixes 4.11

Linus,

please pull the latest sched-urgent-for-linus git tree from:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched-urgent-for-linus

>From the scheduler departement:

 - A bunch of sched deadline related fixes which deal with various buglets
   and corner cases.

 - Two fixes for the loadavg spikes which are caused by the delayed NOHZ
   accounting

Thanks,

	tglx

------------------>
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira (2):
      sched/deadline: Make sure the replenishment timer fires in the next period
      sched/deadline: Throttle a constrained deadline task activated after the deadline

Matt Fleming (2):
      sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting
      sched/loadavg: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for sample window

Steven Rostedt (VMware) (1):
      sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow

Wanpeng Li (1):
      sched/deadline: Add missing update_rq_clock() in dl_task_timer()


 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/sched/loadavg.c  | 20 +++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 99b2c33a9fbc..a2ce59015642 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -445,13 +445,13 @@ static void replenish_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
  *
  * This function returns true if:
  *
- *   runtime / (deadline - t) > dl_runtime / dl_period ,
+ *   runtime / (deadline - t) > dl_runtime / dl_deadline ,
  *
  * IOW we can't recycle current parameters.
  *
- * Notice that the bandwidth check is done against the period. For
+ * Notice that the bandwidth check is done against the deadline. For
  * task with deadline equal to period this is the same of using
- * dl_deadline instead of dl_period in the equation above.
+ * dl_period instead of dl_deadline in the equation above.
  */
 static bool dl_entity_overflow(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
 			       struct sched_dl_entity *pi_se, u64 t)
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static bool dl_entity_overflow(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
 	 * of anything below microseconds resolution is actually fiction
 	 * (but still we want to give the user that illusion >;).
 	 */
-	left = (pi_se->dl_period >> DL_SCALE) * (dl_se->runtime >> DL_SCALE);
+	left = (pi_se->dl_deadline >> DL_SCALE) * (dl_se->runtime >> DL_SCALE);
 	right = ((dl_se->deadline - t) >> DL_SCALE) *
 		(pi_se->dl_runtime >> DL_SCALE);
 
@@ -505,10 +505,15 @@ static void update_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
 	}
 }
 
+static inline u64 dl_next_period(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
+{
+	return dl_se->deadline - dl_se->dl_deadline + dl_se->dl_period;
+}
+
 /*
  * If the entity depleted all its runtime, and if we want it to sleep
  * while waiting for some new execution time to become available, we
- * set the bandwidth enforcement timer to the replenishment instant
+ * set the bandwidth replenishment timer to the replenishment instant
  * and try to activate it.
  *
  * Notice that it is important for the caller to know if the timer
@@ -530,7 +535,7 @@ static int start_dl_timer(struct task_struct *p)
 	 * that it is actually coming from rq->clock and not from
 	 * hrtimer's time base reading.
 	 */
-	act = ns_to_ktime(dl_se->deadline);
+	act = ns_to_ktime(dl_next_period(dl_se));
 	now = hrtimer_cb_get_time(timer);
 	delta = ktime_to_ns(now) - rq_clock(rq);
 	act = ktime_add_ns(act, delta);
@@ -638,6 +643,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart dl_task_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
 		lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, rf.cookie);
 		rq = dl_task_offline_migration(rq, p);
 		rf.cookie = lockdep_pin_lock(&rq->lock);
+		update_rq_clock(rq);
 
 		/*
 		 * Now that the task has been migrated to the new RQ and we
@@ -689,6 +695,37 @@ void init_dl_task_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 	timer->function = dl_task_timer;
 }
 
+/*
+ * During the activation, CBS checks if it can reuse the current task's
+ * runtime and period. If the deadline of the task is in the past, CBS
+ * cannot use the runtime, and so it replenishes the task. This rule
+ * works fine for implicit deadline tasks (deadline == period), and the
+ * CBS was designed for implicit deadline tasks. However, a task with
+ * constrained deadline (deadine < period) might be awakened after the
+ * deadline, but before the next period. In this case, replenishing the
+ * task would allow it to run for runtime / deadline. As in this case
+ * deadline < period, CBS enables a task to run for more than the
+ * runtime / period. In a very loaded system, this can cause a domino
+ * effect, making other tasks miss their deadlines.
+ *
+ * To avoid this problem, in the activation of a constrained deadline
+ * task after the deadline but before the next period, throttle the
+ * task and set the replenishing timer to the begin of the next period,
+ * unless it is boosted.
+ */
+static inline void dl_check_constrained_dl(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
+{
+	struct task_struct *p = dl_task_of(dl_se);
+	struct rq *rq = rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq_of_se(dl_se));
+
+	if (dl_time_before(dl_se->deadline, rq_clock(rq)) &&
+	    dl_time_before(rq_clock(rq), dl_next_period(dl_se))) {
+		if (unlikely(dl_se->dl_boosted || !start_dl_timer(p)))
+			return;
+		dl_se->dl_throttled = 1;
+	}
+}
+
 static
 int dl_runtime_exceeded(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 {
@@ -922,6 +959,11 @@ static void dequeue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
 	__dequeue_dl_entity(dl_se);
 }
 
+static inline bool dl_is_constrained(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
+{
+	return dl_se->dl_deadline < dl_se->dl_period;
+}
+
 static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 {
 	struct task_struct *pi_task = rt_mutex_get_top_task(p);
@@ -948,6 +990,15 @@ static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 	}
 
 	/*
+	 * Check if a constrained deadline task was activated
+	 * after the deadline but before the next period.
+	 * If that is the case, the task will be throttled and
+	 * the replenishment timer will be set to the next period.
+	 */
+	if (!p->dl.dl_throttled && dl_is_constrained(&p->dl))
+		dl_check_constrained_dl(&p->dl);
+
+	/*
 	 * If p is throttled, we do nothing. In fact, if it exhausted
 	 * its budget it needs a replenishment and, since it now is on
 	 * its rq, the bandwidth timer callback (which clearly has not
diff --git a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c
index 7296b7308eca..f15fb2bdbc0d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static inline int calc_load_write_idx(void)
 	 * If the folding window started, make sure we start writing in the
 	 * next idle-delta.
 	 */
-	if (!time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update))
+	if (!time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(calc_load_update)))
 		idx++;
 
 	return idx & 1;
@@ -202,8 +202,9 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void)
 	struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
 
 	/*
-	 * If we're still before the sample window, we're done.
+	 * If we're still before the pending sample window, we're done.
 	 */
+	this_rq->calc_load_update = READ_ONCE(calc_load_update);
 	if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update))
 		return;
 
@@ -212,7 +213,6 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void)
 	 * accounted through the nohz accounting, so skip the entire deal and
 	 * sync up for the next window.
 	 */
-	this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update;
 	if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update + 10))
 		this_rq->calc_load_update += LOAD_FREQ;
 }
@@ -308,13 +308,15 @@ calc_load_n(unsigned long load, unsigned long exp,
  */
 static void calc_global_nohz(void)
 {
+	unsigned long sample_window;
 	long delta, active, n;
 
-	if (!time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update + 10)) {
+	sample_window = READ_ONCE(calc_load_update);
+	if (!time_before(jiffies, sample_window + 10)) {
 		/*
 		 * Catch-up, fold however many we are behind still
 		 */
-		delta = jiffies - calc_load_update - 10;
+		delta = jiffies - sample_window - 10;
 		n = 1 + (delta / LOAD_FREQ);
 
 		active = atomic_long_read(&calc_load_tasks);
@@ -324,7 +326,7 @@ static void calc_global_nohz(void)
 		avenrun[1] = calc_load_n(avenrun[1], EXP_5, active, n);
 		avenrun[2] = calc_load_n(avenrun[2], EXP_15, active, n);
 
-		calc_load_update += n * LOAD_FREQ;
+		WRITE_ONCE(calc_load_update, sample_window + n * LOAD_FREQ);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -352,9 +354,11 @@ static inline void calc_global_nohz(void) { }
  */
 void calc_global_load(unsigned long ticks)
 {
+	unsigned long sample_window;
 	long active, delta;
 
-	if (time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update + 10))
+	sample_window = READ_ONCE(calc_load_update);
+	if (time_before(jiffies, sample_window + 10))
 		return;
 
 	/*
@@ -371,7 +375,7 @@ void calc_global_load(unsigned long ticks)
 	avenrun[1] = calc_load(avenrun[1], EXP_5, active);
 	avenrun[2] = calc_load(avenrun[2], EXP_15, active);
 
-	calc_load_update += LOAD_FREQ;
+	WRITE_ONCE(calc_load_update, sample_window + LOAD_FREQ);
 
 	/*
 	 * In case we idled for multiple LOAD_FREQ intervals, catch up in bulk.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ