linux-kernel - Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170317020951.GA3942@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:09:51 +0800
From:   Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To:     Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc:     Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kexec regression since 4.9 caused by efi

On 03/16/17 at 12:41pm, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar, at 03:37:48PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > 
> > Omar, could you try below patch? Looking at the efi_mem_desc_lookup, it is not
> > correct to be used in efi_arch_mem_reserve, if it passed your test, I
> > can rewrite patch log with more background and send it out:
> > 
> >         for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) {
> > 		[snip]
> >                 if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME) &&
> >                     md->type != EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_DATA &&
> >                     md->type != EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA) {
> >                         continue;
> >                 }
> > 
> > In above code, it meant to get a md of EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME of either boot
> > data or runtime data, this is wrong for efi_mem_reserve, because we are
> > reserving boot data which has no EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME attribute at the
> > running time. Just is happened to work and we did not capture the error.
> 
> Wouldn't something like this be simpler?
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> index 30031d5293c4..cdfe8c628959 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -201,6 +201,10 @@ void __init efi_arch_mem_reserve(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* No need to reserve regions that will never be freed. */
> +	if (md.attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME)
> +		return;
> +

Matt, I think it should be fine although I think the md type checking in
efi_mem_desc_lookup() is causing confusion and not easy to understand..

How about move the if chunk early like below because it seems no need
to sanity check the addr + size any more if the md is still RUNTIME?

--- linux-x86.orig/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
+++ linux-x86/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
@@ -196,6 +196,10 @@ void __init efi_arch_mem_reserve(phys_ad
 		return;
 	}
 
+	/* No need to reserve regions that will never be freed. */
+	if (md.attribute & EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME)
+		return;
+
 	if (addr + size > md.phys_addr + (md.num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT)) {
 		pr_err("Region spans EFI memory descriptors, %pa\n", &addr);
 		return;

Thanks
Dave