[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxrbQpisKU1ZuymdpYgSdxSUZ98k-fXjHZy9G9DwCXtgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:36:22 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
zijun_hu <zijun_hu@....com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, tipbuild@...or.com,
LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [x86] 45fc8757d1: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I can easily imagine that breaking WINE or DOSEMU because it'll affect
> the LDT, too.
Can they even *read* the LDT contents, though? The whole accessed bit
doesn't show up in 'struct user_desc', so you can neither set it nor
read it.
> How about this:
I don't think that's _wrong_, but..
I'd really rather just do it in fill_ldt() itself, unless you can
explain how it would be visible to anybody..
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists