[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170318184428.GA12858@singhal-Inspiron-5558>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 00:14:29 +0530
From: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
To: lars@...afoo.de
Cc: Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH v4] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code
The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by
the IIO core only for protecting device operating mode changes.
ie. Changes between INDIO_DIRECT_MODE, INDIO_BUFFER_* modes.
In this driver, mlock was being used to protect hardware state
changes. Replace it with buf_lock in the devices global data.
As buf_lock protects both the adis16060_spi_write() and
adis16060_spi_read() functions and both are always called in
pair. First write, then read. Thus, refactor the code to have
one single function adis16060_spi_write_than_read() which is
protected by the existing buf_lock.
Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
---
v4:
-Refactored code
-change commit subject
-change commit message
drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c | 37 ++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
index c9d46e7..39ddd55 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16060_core.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ struct adis16060_state {
static struct iio_dev *adis16060_iio_dev;
-static int adis16060_spi_write(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u8 val)
+static int adis16060_spi_write_than_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u8 val, u16 *val2)
{
int ret;
struct adis16060_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
@@ -48,17 +48,11 @@ static int adis16060_spi_write(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u8 val)
mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
st->buf[2] = val; /* The last 8 bits clocked in are latched */
ret = spi_write(st->us_w, st->buf, 3);
- mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
- return ret;
-}
-
-static int adis16060_spi_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u16 *val)
-{
- int ret;
- struct adis16060_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
-
- mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
+ return ret;
+ }
ret = spi_read(st->us_r, st->buf, 3);
@@ -67,10 +61,10 @@ static int adis16060_spi_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, u16 *val)
* starts to place data MSB first on the DOUT line at
* the 6th falling edge of SCLK
*/
- if (!ret)
- *val = ((st->buf[0] & 0x3) << 12) |
- (st->buf[1] << 4) |
- ((st->buf[2] >> 4) & 0xF);
+ if (!ret)
+ *val2 = ((st->buf[0] & 0x3) << 12) |
+ (st->buf[1] << 4) |
+ ((st->buf[2] >> 4) & 0xF);
mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
return ret;
@@ -83,20 +77,17 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
{
u16 tval = 0;
int ret;
+ struct adis16060_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
switch (mask) {
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
/* Take the iio_dev status lock */
- mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
- ret = adis16060_spi_write(indio_dev, chan->address);
+ mutex_lock(&st->buf_lock);
+ ret = adis16060_spi_write_than_read(indio_dev, chan->address, &tval);
if (ret < 0)
goto out_unlock;
- ret = adis16060_spi_read(indio_dev, &tval);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out_unlock;
-
- mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
+ mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
*val = tval;
return IIO_VAL_INT;
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
@@ -112,7 +103,7 @@ static int adis16060_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
return -EINVAL;
out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
+ mutex_unlock(&st->buf_lock);
return ret;
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists