linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: Prefer unsigned int to bare use of unsigned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4fbe24d7-ffd6-00a6-c217-75b3294c5c0a@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 19 Mar 2017 10:37:42 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Miguel Robles <miguel.robles@...ole.net>, lars@...afoo.de,
        knaack.h@....de
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: Prefer unsigned int to bare use of unsigned

On 16/03/17 23:35, Miguel Robles wrote:
> Fix checkpatch warnings:
> WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Robles <miguel.robles@...ole.net>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing
for the autobuilders to play with it.

Thanks,

Jonathan
> ---
>  drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c
> index 0890934..dd84e87 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c
> @@ -41,11 +41,11 @@ struct bma180_data;
>  
>  struct bma180_part_info {
>  	const struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> -	unsigned num_channels;
> +	unsigned int num_channels;
>  	const int *scale_table;
> -	unsigned num_scales;
> +	unsigned int num_scales;
>  	const int *bw_table;
> -	unsigned num_bw;
> +	unsigned int num_bw;
>  
>  	u8 int_reset_reg, int_reset_mask;
>  	u8 sleep_reg, sleep_mask;
> @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ static void bma250_chip_disable(struct bma180_data *data)
>  	dev_err(&data->client->dev, "failed to disable the chip\n");
>  }
>  
> -static ssize_t bma180_show_avail(char *buf, const int *vals, unsigned n,
> +static ssize_t bma180_show_avail(char *buf, const int *vals, unsigned int n,
>  				 bool micros)
>  {
>  	size_t len = 0;
>