[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2735706.OR0SQDpVy6@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 22:24:42 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
joeyli <jlee@...e.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: memory hotplug and force_remove
On Monday, March 20, 2017 03:29:39 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
Hi,
> we have been chasing the following BUG() triggering during the memory
> hotremove (remove_memory):
> ret = walk_memory_range(PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_UP(start + size - 1), NULL,
> check_memblock_offlined_cb);
> if (ret)
> BUG();
>
> and it took a while to learn that the issue is caused by
> /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove being enabled. I was really
> surprised to see such an option because at least for the memory hotplug
> it cannot work at all. Memory hotplug fails when the memory is still
> in use. Even if we do not BUG() here enforcing the hotplug operation
> will lead to problematic behavior later like crash or a silent memory
> corruption if the memory gets onlined back and reused by somebody else.
>
> I am wondering what was the motivation for introducing this behavior and
> whether there is a way to disallow it for memory hotplug. Or maybe drop
> it completely. What would break in such a case?
Honestly, I don't remember from the top of my head and I haven't looked at
that code for several months.
I need some time to recall that.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists