linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170320121328.GH17263@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:13:28 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:14:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>:
> > Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a):
> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> >>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which
> >>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The
> >>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide
> >>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> >>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> >>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++---
> >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it,
> >
> > Great, please merge it.
> >
> >> but I don't see
> >> the rest of the series queued anywhere.
> >
> > I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree.
> >
> 
> I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec.
> 
> 
> So, how shall we handle this series?
> 
> 
> I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree,
> but 6/6 will be postponed in the case.
> 
> 
> 
> If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series
> to linux-kbuild.

Ok, that works for me too. For the first patch:

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>

So please take this via linux-kbuild.

Will