[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490014505.19767.103.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:55:05 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Bin Gao <bin.gao@...el.com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] mfd: Add Cherry Trail Whiskey Cove PMIC driver
On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 10:41 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Mar 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-03-17 at 10:55 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > +enum {
> > > + CHT_WC_PWRSRC_IRQ = 0,
> > > + CHT_WC_THRM_IRQ,
> > > + CHT_WC_BCU_IRQ,
> > > + CHT_WC_ADC_IRQ,
> > > + CHT_WC_EXT_CHGR_IRQ,
> > > + CHT_WC_GPIO_IRQ,
> > > + /* There is no irq 6 */
> > > + CHT_WC_CRIT_IRQ = 7,
> >
> > I would prefer explicit over implicit (adding = N to each line), but
> > this is minor.
>
> No need. The C standard is clear on what is expected of enums.
I understand that, though I don't like gaps in enums. That's why I
prefer in such cases pure #define over enum (yes, I understand that enum
in many cases is better).
But this all matter of taste. So, I will not insist if it would be left
as it is now.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists