lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170320140618.GF31213@leverpostej>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:06:18 +0000
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] arm64: arch_timer: Get rid of
 erratum_workaround_set_sne

On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:26:11AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Let's move the handling of workarounds affecting set_next_event
> to the affected function, instead of overwriding the pointers

Nit: overriding

> as an afterthough. Yes, this is an extra indirection on the
> erratum handling path, but the HW is busted anyway.

[...]

> +#define erratum_set_next_event_tval_virt(...)		({BUG_ON(1); 0;})
> +#define erratum_set_next_event_tval_phys(...)		({BUG_ON(1); 0;})

Nit: BUG()

[...]

>  {
> +	if (needs_unstable_timer_counter_workaround())
> +		return erratum_set_next_event_tval_virt(evt, clk);
> +
>  	set_next_event(ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_ACCESS, evt, clk);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -487,6 +490,9 @@ static int arch_timer_set_next_event_virt(unsigned long evt,
>  static int arch_timer_set_next_event_phys(unsigned long evt,
>  					  struct clock_event_device *clk)
>  {
> +	if (needs_unstable_timer_counter_workaround())
> +		return erratum_set_next_event_tval_phys(evt, clk);
> +
>  	set_next_event(ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_ACCESS, evt, clk);
>  	return 0;
>  }

I take it that the new conditionals are NOPs in the !erratum case, so
this doesn't adversely affect the usual case.

Thanks,
Mark.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ