[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170320145803.GI31213@leverpostej>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:58:03 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/17] arm64: arch_timer: Workaround for Cortex-A73
erratum 858921
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:26:20AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Cortex-A73 (all versions) counter read can return a wrong value
> when the counter crosses a 32bit boundary.
>
> The workaround involves performing the read twice, and to return
> one or the other depending on whether a transition has taken place.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_858921
> +static u64 notrace arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0(void)
> +{
> + u64 _old, _new;
> +
> + _old = read_sysreg(cntvct_el0);
> + _new = read_sysreg(cntvct_el0);
> + return (((_old ^ _new) >> 32) & 1) ? _old : _new;
> +}
> +#endif
Given this is a static inline, I think we can drop the underscores here.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists