linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 04/35] MIPS: Update defconfigs for NF_CT_PROTO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170320164347.GG14919@linux-mips.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2017 17:43:48 +0100
From:   Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 04/35] MIPS: Update defconfigs for
 NF_CT_PROTO_DCCP/UDPLITE change

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:29:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> You reported it there, but then on your other emails for other stable
> trees, said that your previously mentioned patches fixed problems in
> these trees as well.  A bit confusing, sorry I got it wrong.
> 
> Anyway, not a big deal, is this worth me reverting?  Does this cause an
> issue with these arches on older kernels?

Can't imagine this is going to cause an issue and in case of doubt a "y"
should be safer than a "m" anyway ...

  Ralf