linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip] x86/mm: Correct fixmap header usage on adaptable MODULES

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2017 23:08:07 +0800
From:   Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip] x86/mm: Correct fixmap header usage on adaptable
 MODULES_END

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:31:17AM -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 09:25:00AM -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>>>On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:50:34AM -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>>>>>This patch remove fixmap header usage on non-x86 code that was
>>>>>introduced by the adaptable MODULE_END change.
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Thomas
>>>>
>>>> In this patch, it looks you are trying to do two things for my understanding:
>>>> 1. To include <asm/fixmap.h> in asm/pagetable_64.h and remove the include in
>>>> some of the x86 files
>>>> 2. Remove <asm/fixmap.h> in mm/vmalloc.c
>>>>
>>>> I think your change log covers the second task in the patch, but not not talk
>>>> about the first task you did in the patch. If you could mention it in commit
>>>> log, it would be good for maintain.
>>>
>>>I agree, I am not the best at writing commits (by far). What's the
>>>best way for me to correct that? (the bot seem to have taken it).
>>>
>>
>> Simply mention it in your commit log is enough to me.
>>
>
>I meant, do I send another patch or reply on in this thread and bot
>will pick it up?
>

I think it is necessary to send V2.

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)