linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] coresight: bindings for CPU debug module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170320153215.GA15068@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:32:15 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, mike.leach@...aro.org,
        Suzuki.Poulose@....com, sudeep.holla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] coresight: bindings for CPU debug module

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 07:49:53PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> 
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13:35AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > +- compatible : should be
> > > +	     * "arm,coresight-cpu-debug"; supplemented with "arm,primecell"
> > > +	       since this driver is using the AMBA bus interface.
> > 
> > This description needs to be refactored - see my comment from an earlier post
> > for more details.
> 
> I have refined this description according to your suggestion:
> http://archive.armlinux.org.uk/lurker/message/20170301.154550.f55a09d5.en.html

My apologies here, I did not express myself properly.  You got the wording right
but the format is a little bizarre.  The line break after "should be" and the
sentence that starts with a '*' on the next line feel unatural.  Simply

compatible : should be "arm,coresight-cpu-debug"; supplemented with
             "arm,primecell" since this driver is using the AMBA bus interface.

will be fine.

> 
> Am I missing anthing for this?
> 
> > > +- reg : physical base address and length of the register set.
> > > +
> > > +- clocks : the clock associated to this component.
> > > +
> > > +- clock-names : the name of the clock referenced by the code. Since we are
> > > +                using the AMBA framework, the name of the clock providing
> > > +		the interconnect should be "apb_pclk" and the clock is
> > > +		mandatory. The interface between the debug logic and the
> > > +		processor core is clocked by the internal CPU clock, so it
> > > +		is enabled with CPU clock by default.
> > > +
> > > +- cpu : the cpu phandle the debug module is affined to. When omitted
> > > +	the module is considered to belong to CPU0.
> > > +
> > > +Optional properties:
> > 
> > s/properties/property
> > 
> > > +
> > > +- power-domains: a phandle to power domain node for debug module. We can
> > > +		 use "nohlt" to ensure CPU power domain is enabled.
> > 
> > The "power-domains" property is to take care of the debug power domain.  The
> > "nohlt" is to make sure registers in the CPU power domain are accessible - both
> > are independent from one another.  As such the description for this binding
> > shoudl be:
> > 
> > "a phandle to the debug power domain".
> 
> Will fix for upper two comments.
> 
> Thanks,
> Leo Yan