linux-kernel - Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: update architecture list in documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87mvcfp111.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:00:26 +1100
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>
Cc:     Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>,
        "kernel-hardening\@lists.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        "linux-doc\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev\@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: update architecture list in documentation

Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>> Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com> writes:
>>
>>> Commit 65c059bcaa73 ("powerpc: Enable support for GCC plugins") enabled GCC
>>> plugins on powerpc, but neglected to update the architecture list in the
>>> docs. Rectify this.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 65c059bcaa73 ("powerpc: Enable support for GCC plugins")
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/gcc-plugins.txt | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> It would be nice to merge this for v4.11, so the docs are up to do date
>> with the code for the release.
>>
>> I'm not sure who owns it though, should it go via Jon as docs
>> maintainer (added to CC), or via Kees tree or mine?
>
> If you have other changes queued for v4.11, please take it via your
> tree. Otherwise, perhaps the docs tree or mine? (I don't currently
> have any fixes queued; I'm just trying to minimize pull requests going
> to Linus...)

I have some fixes queued already, so unless Jon yells I'll take it in
the next day or so.

cheers