[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170321075934.o4sccpawzn4rmtvh@angband.pl>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:59:34 +0100
From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: x86: Unalbe to run x32 processes on the x86_64 kernel
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:45:39AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > # first bad commit: [45fc8757d1d2128e342b4e7ef39adedf7752faac] x86:
> > Make the GDT remapping read-only on 64-bit
>
> Just wondering, does the following commit fix it:
>
> 5b781c7e317f x86/tls: Forcibly set the accessed bit in TLS segments
It does fix i386 but not x32.
By "x32" I mean CONFIG_X86_X32, by "i386" CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION, contrary to
Andrei's first report. The naming of the new ABI wasn't too fortunate...
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Meow!
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Collisions shmolisions, let's see them find a collision or second
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ preimage for double rot13!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists