[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170321113629.GW21222@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:36:29 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>,
Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, fabio.estevam@....com, mchehab@...nel.org,
nick@...anahar.org, markus.heiser@...marIT.de,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
bparrot@...com, geert@...ux-m68k.org, arnd@...db.de,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com,
tiffany.lin@...iatek.com, jean-christophe.trotin@...com,
horms+renesas@...ge.net.au, robert.jarzmik@...e.fr,
songjun.wu@...rochip.com, andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, shuah@...nel.org,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com, pavel@....cz,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/39] i.MX Media Driver
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:59:02AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Ah, good to hear that -s works with MC. I was not sure about that.
> Thanks for the feedback!
Not soo good on iMX6:
$ v4l2-compliance -d /dev/video10 -s --expbuf-device=/dev/video0
...
Input ioctls:
test VIDIOC_G/S_TUNER/ENUM_FREQ_BANDS: OK (Not Supported)
test VIDIOC_G/S_FREQUENCY: OK (Not Supported)
test VIDIOC_S_HW_FREQ_SEEK: OK (Not Supported)
test VIDIOC_ENUMAUDIO: OK (Not Supported)
fail: v4l2-test-input-output.cpp(420): G_INPUT not supported for a capture device
test VIDIOC_G/S/ENUMINPUT: FAIL
test VIDIOC_G/S_AUDIO: OK (Not Supported)
Inputs: 0 Audio Inputs: 0 Tuners: 0
...
Control ioctls:
test VIDIOC_QUERY_EXT_CTRL/QUERYMENU: OK
test VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL: OK
test VIDIOC_G/S_CTRL: OK
test VIDIOC_G/S/TRY_EXT_CTRLS: OK
fail: v4l2-test-controls.cpp(782): subscribe event for control 'User Controls' failed
test VIDIOC_(UN)SUBSCRIBE_EVENT/DQEVENT: FAIL
...
Streaming ioctls:
test read/write: OK (Not Supported)
fail: v4l2-test-buffers.cpp(297): g_field() == V4L2_FIELD_ANY
fail: v4l2-test-buffers.cpp(703): buf.check(q, last_seq)
fail: v4l2-test-buffers.cpp(973): captureBufs(node, q, m2m_q, frame_count, false)
test MMAP: FAIL
test USERPTR: OK (Not Supported)
fail: v4l2-test-buffers.cpp(1188): can_stream && ret != EINVAL
test DMABUF: FAIL
(/dev/video0 being CODA). CODA itself seems to have failures:
Format ioctls:
test VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT/FRAMESIZES/FRAMEINTERVALS: OK
warn: v4l2-test-formats.cpp(1187): S_PARM is supported for buftype 2, but not ENUM_FRAMEINTERVALS
warn: v4l2-test-formats.cpp(1194): S_PARM is supported but doesn't report V4L2_CAP_TIMEPERFRAME
test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: OK
test VIDIOC_G_FBUF: OK (Not Supported)
test VIDIOC_G_FMT: OK
test VIDIOC_TRY_FMT: OK
fail: v4l2-test-formats.cpp(774): fmt_out.g_colorspace() != col
...
Streaming ioctls:
test read/write: OK (Not Supported)
fail: v4l2-test-buffers.cpp(956): q.create_bufs(node, 1, &fmt) != EINVAL
test MMAP: FAIL
test USERPTR: OK (Not Supported)
test DMABUF: Cannot test, specify --expbuf-device
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists