[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3n_rhxeVJ9LYsV_7gg1kB-HY5uzBHJ9VKM_sgRijkPFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:54:31 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] misc: ds1682: Add OF device ID table
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@....samsung.com> wrote:
> The driver doesn't have a struct of_device_id table but supported devices
> are registered via Device Trees. This is working on the assumption that a
> I2C device registered via OF will always match a legacy I2C device ID and
> that the MODALIAS reported will always be of the form i2c:<device>.
>
> But this could change in the future so the correct approach is to have an
> OF device ID table if the devices are registered via OF.
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists