[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170321141031.GG30407@ulmo.ba.sec>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:10:31 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-tegra tree with the drm tree
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:45:45AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-tegra tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 10437d9b475e ("drm: tegra: use vblank hooks in struct drm_crtc_funcs")
>
> from the drm tree and commit:
>
> 3f2ea8cee24f ("drm/tegra: Don't leak kernel pointer to userspace")
>
> from the drm-tegra tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Stephen,
your resolution looks good to me.
Dave,
the conflict is fairly trivial to resolve, but if you prefer I can
rebase the Tegra tree onto your -next to avoid it.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists