[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170321140807.GB2531@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:08:07 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
alexis.berlemont@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf/sdt/x86: Add renaming logic for rNN and other
registers
Em Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:11:59PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:41:40 +0530
> Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > 'perf probe' is failing for sdt markers whose arguments has rNN
> > (with postfix b/w/d), %rsp, %esp, %sil etc. registers. Add renaming
> > logic for these registers.
> >
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thanks, applied right after that v5 series from Alexis.
> Thanks!
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
> > index 09a7f55..d8a8dcf 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
> > @@ -48,10 +48,42 @@ static const struct sdt_name_reg sdt_reg_renamings[] = {
> > SDT_NAME_REG(rdx, dx),
> > SDT_NAME_REG(esi, si),
> > SDT_NAME_REG(rsi, si),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(sil, si),
> > SDT_NAME_REG(edi, di),
> > SDT_NAME_REG(rdi, di),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(dil, di),
> > SDT_NAME_REG(ebp, bp),
> > SDT_NAME_REG(rbp, bp),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(bpl, bp),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(rsp, sp),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(esp, sp),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(spl, sp),
> > +
> > + /* rNN registers */
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r8b, r8),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r8w, r8),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r8d, r8),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r9b, r9),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r9w, r9),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r9d, r9),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r10b, r10),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r10w, r10),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r10d, r10),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r11b, r11),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r11w, r11),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r11d, r11),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r12b, r12),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r12w, r12),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r12d, r12),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r13b, r13),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r13w, r13),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r13d, r13),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r14b, r14),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r14w, r14),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r14d, r14),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r15b, r15),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r15w, r15),
> > + SDT_NAME_REG(r15d, r15),
> > SDT_NAME_REG_END,
> > };
> >
> > @@ -88,18 +120,6 @@ int sdt_rename_register(char **pdesc, char *old_name)
> >
> > /* Copy the chars after the register name (if need be) */
> > offset = prefix_len + sdt_len;
> > - if (offset < old_desc_len) {
> > - /*
> > - * The orginal register name can be suffixed by 'b',
> > - * 'w' or 'd' to indicate its size; so, we need to
> > - * skip this char if we met one.
> > - */
> > - char sfx = old_desc[offset];
> > -
> > - if (sfx == 'b' || sfx == 'w' || sfx == 'd')
> > - offset++;
> > - }
> > -
> > if (offset < old_desc_len)
> > memcpy(new_desc + prefix_len + uprobe_len,
> > old_desc + offset, old_desc_len - offset);
> > --
> > 2.9.3
> >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists