lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2017 19:24:46 +0300
From:   Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>
To:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <0x7f454c46@...il.com>, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: set x32 syscall bit in SET_PERSONALITY()

On 03/21/2017 06:55 PM, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> After my changes to mmap(), its code now relies on the bitness of
> performing syscall. According to that, it chooses the base of allocation:
> mmap_base for 64-bit mmap() and mmap_compat_base for 32-bit syscall.
> It was done by:
>   commit 1b028f784e8c ("x86/mm: Introduce mmap_compat_base() for
> 32-bit mmap()").
>
> The code afterwards relies on in_compat_syscall() returning true for
> 32-bit syscalls. It's usually so while we're in context of application
> that does 32-bit syscalls. But during exec() it is not valid for x32 ELF.
> The reason is that the application hasn't yet done any syscall, so x32
> bit has not being set.
> For i386 ELFs it works as SET_PERSONALITY() sets TS_COMPAT flag.
>
> I suggest to set x32 bit before first return to userspace, during
> setting personality at exec(). This way we can rely on
> in_compat_syscall() during exec().
>
> Fixes: commit 1b028f784e8c ("x86/mm: Introduce mmap_compat_base() for
> 32-bit mmap()")
> Cc: 0x7f454c46@...il.com
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Reported-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>

Drop this one - I'll send updated v2 shortly slightly improving:
- specifying mmap() allocation path which failed during exec()
- fix comment style (looks like my editor didn't insert asterisks
   as they were missing before and check_patch didn't blame me)

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> index d6b784a5520d..88d99d35a699 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> @@ -520,7 +520,12 @@ void set_personality_ia32(bool x32)
>  			current->mm->context.ia32_compat = TIF_X32;
>  		current->personality &= ~READ_IMPLIES_EXEC;
>  		/* in_compat_syscall() uses the presence of the x32
> -		   syscall bit flag to determine compat status */
> +		   syscall bit flag to determine compat status.
> +		   On the bitness of syscall relies x86 mmap() code,
> +		   so set x32 syscall bit right here to make
> +		   in_compat_syscall() work during exec().
> +		 */
> +		task_pt_regs(current)->orig_ax |= __X32_SYSCALL_BIT;
>  		current->thread.status &= ~TS_COMPAT;
>  	} else {
>  		set_thread_flag(TIF_IA32);
>


-- 
              Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ