linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ATA/ARM: convert ARM/DaVinci to use libata PATA drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170321165650.GA3706@htj.duckdns.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:56:50 -0400
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
        Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] ATA/ARM: convert ARM/DaVinci to use libata PATA
 drivers

Hello,

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:08:26PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> > Looks fine to me from libata side.  Once it gets tested, how should
> > the patches be routed?  I don't think it'd make sense to route them
> > separately.
> 
> Hi Tejun, I can take the series through ARM-SoC tree with your ack.

Once the review points are addressed, please feel free to add

 Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

and route through the arm tree.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun