lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAChUvXMxreofSQqsv-+Pgq9uZPpJ24P0geUYes_6Lu8nCtsNGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:08:54 -0500
From:   Tracy Smith <tlsmith3777@...il.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Question: Linux changes required for off control board RTC

Hi, not sure if this is the correct venue to post a question, so
please forgive and direct me to the correct board or list if not.

A custom board implementation using a ARM-8 Cortex A53 NXP LS1043ardb
is considering moving the RTC from the control board to an FPGA.
Reason is for accuracy of time/date and efficiency for their FPGA/DSP
application.

1) What kernel changes would be required to support such an
implementation and these would need to be pushed to the community
under the GPL?

2) Is it a trivial task to make such changes in the kernel to support
an RTC not located on the control board/SoC itself?

3) What is the expected behavior of the kernel with no changes added
to accommodate such an architecture?

4) Is there a configurable kernel option to allow for such a change,
or have these or similar changes already been added to the kernel?

thx,
Tracy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ