[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA_NBvRQpuXJ2iZs_8n3b6920Z6E5ueuiAeF-4JCcqPRxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 22:10:41 +0000
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
To: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, kvm-devel <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>, wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com,
wuquanming@...wei.com, huangshaoyu@...wei.com,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS
On 21 March 2017 at 19:39, Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org> wrote:
> My confusion here comes from not thinking about QEMU or KVM as firmware,
> but as the machine, so it would be sort of like the functionality is
> baked into hardware rather than firmware.
There is precedent for that kind of thing -- we implement PSCI
in KVM/QEMU for the guest, though in real hardware it would be
provided by firmware at EL3.
thanks
-- PMM
Powered by blists - more mailing lists