linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: Don't create a platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170322225853.GH8329@suse.de>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:58:53 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: Don't create a platform_device for
 IOAPIC/IOxAPIC

Hi Rafael,

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 06:42:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 22, 2017 06:33:25 PM Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> > 
> > No platform-device is required for IO(x)APICs, so don't even
> > create them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> 
> If we do this, I'd prefer not to do [2/3], because we'll introduce code that
> will be essentially dead then.

In this case the code in acpi_bus_attach() adding platform_devices is also
dead. Could it be removed then?

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c | 8 +++++---
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > index b4c1a6a..03250e1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_platform.c
> > @@ -25,9 +25,11 @@
> >  ACPI_MODULE_NAME("platform");
> >  
> >  static const struct acpi_device_id forbidden_id_list[] = {
> > -	{"PNP0000", 0},	/* PIC */
> > -	{"PNP0100", 0},	/* Timer */
> > -	{"PNP0200", 0},	/* AT DMA Controller */
> 
> Why do you change the existing entries?

Just to align the '0's in one column :)


	Joerg