lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:58:05 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ACPI: Don't create a platform_device for
 IOAPIC/IOxAPIC

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:44:18AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > It is not dead.
> >
> > Platform devices are actually created by it, but they never go away.
> 
> IOW, they should never be created for anything hot-removable.
> 
> If they are, this is a bug (as you noticed).

Okay, in this case patch 2 can be omitted.

But for my understanding, platform_devices created in acpi_bus_attach()
that are not hot-removable don't take a reference to the host_bridge,
right (at least when the host-bridge is hot-removable)?

Otherwise this would be a leak again in case the host-bridge gets
removed.


	Joerg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ