[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170322054140.GA30295@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:11:40 +0530
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyasbp@...il.com>,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/4] powernv: Move CPU-Offline idle state invocation
from smp.c to idle.c
Hi Nick,
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:35:17AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 21:24:15 +0530
> "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > Move the piece of code in powernv/smp.c::pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self() which
> > transitions the CPU to the deepest available platform idle state to a
> > new function named pnv_cpu_offline() in powernv/idle.c. The rationale
> > behind this code movement is that the data required to determine the
> > deepest available platform state resides in powernv/idle.c.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Looks good. As a nitpick, possibly one or two variables in idle.c could
> become static (pnv_deepest_stop_psscr_*).
>
I changed that, but it ended up being in the next patch.
> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
>
Thanks!
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists