linux-kernel - Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:41:50 -0700
From:   Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
        "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
        Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        zijun_hu <zijun_hu@....com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] [x86] 69218e4799: BUG:kernel_hang_in_boot_stage

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Linus Torvalds
>> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>> The issue seems to be related to exceptions happening in close pages
>>>> to the fixmap GDT remapping.
>>>>
>>>> The original page fault happen in do_test_wp_bit which set a fixmap
>>>> entry to test WP flag. If I grow the number of processors supported
>>>> increasing the distance between the remapped GDT page and the WP test
>>>> page, the error does not reproduce.
>>>>
>>>> I am still looking at the exact distance between repro and no-repro as
>>>> well as the exact root cause.
>>>
>>> Hmm. Have we set the GDT limit incorrectly, somehow? The GDT *can*
>>> cover 8k entries, which at 8 bytes each would be 64kB.
>>
>> The QEMU barf says the GDT limit is 0xff, for better or for worse.
>>
>>>
>>> So somebody trying to load an invalid segment (say, 0xffff) might end
>>> up causing an access to the GDT base + 64k - 8.
>>>
>>> It is also possible that the CPU might do a page table writability
>>> check *before* it does the limit check. That would sound odd, though.
>>> Might be a CPU errata.
>>>
>>
>
>> There's presumably something genuinely wrong with our GDT.
>
> This is suspicious.  I added this code in test_wp_bit:
>
>     if (memcmp(get_current_gdt_ro(), get_current_gdt_rw(), 4096) != 0) {
>         pr_err("Oh crap\n");
>         BUG_ON(1);
>     }
>
> It printed "Oh crap" and blew up.  Methinks something's wrong with the
> fixmap.  Is it possible that we're crossing a PMD boundary and failing
> to translate the addresses right?

I might be that. We crash when the PKMAP_BASE is just after the FIX_WP_TEST.

I will continue testing couple scenarios and design a fix. Moving the
GDT FIXMAP at the beginning or align the base (or pad the end).

-- 
Thomas