linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/5] Intel PMIC: Intel PMIC mfd and OPRegion drivers must be built in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:29:18 +0100
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Intel PMIC: Intel PMIC mfd and OPRegion drivers must be built in

Hi All,

Here is a series enforcing Intel PMIC mfd and OPRegion drivers to be built
in, this is necessary so that the OPRegion handlers are registered before
other drivers try to enter D0 which may require these OPRegion handlers.

Note patches 4 & 5 are for drivers which have been submitted but not
yet accepted in -next, so theoretically they could be squashed into
the original patches, but I believe it is good to keep them as separate
commits to have a git history which documents why these are builtin.

The patches span both the mfd and ACPI subsystems but can me merged
independently of each other I'm posting this as a single series as
both sides are part of fixing the same issue.

Regards,

Hans