[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170322110050.1e2ea77d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:00:50 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes
tree
Hi Dave,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
between commit:
3d3d18f086cd ("drm/i915: Avoid rcu_barrier() from reclaim paths (shrinker)")
from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:
519d52498156 ("drm/i915: i915_gem_shrink_all() needs an awake device")
from the drm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
index d5d2b4c6ed38,006a8b908f77..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
@@@ -263,7 -264,9 +264,9 @@@ unsigned long i915_gem_shrink_all(struc
I915_SHRINK_BOUND |
I915_SHRINK_UNBOUND |
I915_SHRINK_ACTIVE);
+ intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
+
- rcu_barrier(); /* wait until our RCU delayed slab frees are completed */
+ synchronize_rcu(); /* wait for our earlier RCU delayed slab frees */
return freed;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists