lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170322021343.GE802@shells.gnugeneration.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2017 19:13:43 -0700
From:   lkml@...garu.com
To:     lkml@...garu.com
Cc:     "Bowers, AndrewX" <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>,
        "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>,
        "vcaputo@...garu.com" <vcaputo@...garu.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Singleton <davsingl@...co.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        khalidm <khalidm@...co.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] 4.11.0-rc1 panic on shutdown X61s

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:04:45PM -0700, lkml@...garu.com wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:13:40PM +0000, Bowers, AndrewX wrote:
> > Tested this on a Thinkpad T420i, after verifying it also has an e1000e NIC, unable to  reproduce. Might be limited to that particular model/firmware version you're using, which I was not able to track down here although there is another person I could ask, might be able to come up with one yet.
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces@...ts.osuosl.org] On
> > > Behalf Of lkml@...garu.com
> > > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 7:41 PM
> > > To: Brown, Aaron F <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
> > > Cc: vcaputo@...garu.com; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; David Singleton
> > > <davsingl@...co.com>; linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>;
> > > khalidm <khalidm@...co.com>; Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>; Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>; intel-
> > > wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] 4.11.0-rc1 panic on shutdown X61s
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:20:27AM +0000, Brown, Aaron F wrote:
> > > > > Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> writes:
> > > > > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 03:55:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> The only change that IMHO matters happened between v4.10 and
> > > > > >> v4.11-
> > > > > rc1 is this:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> @@ -6276,8 +6274,8 @@ static int e1000e_pm_freeze(struct device
> > > *dev)
> > > > > >>                 /* Quiesce the device without resetting the hardware */
> > > > > >>                 e1000e_down(adapter, false);
> > > > > >>                 e1000_free_irq(adapter);
> > > > > >> +               e1000e_reset_interrupt_capability(adapter);
> > > > > >>         }
> > > > > >> -       e1000e_reset_interrupt_capability(adapter);
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> So, it apparently misses something for the other case, like
> > > > > >> pci_disable_msi() call or so.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, lemme add the people from
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   7e54d9d063fa ("e1000e: driver trying to free already-free irq")
> > > > > >
> > > > > > to CC then. :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Already did that a week ago:
> > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg423379.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Haven't heard anything back yet.  Wondering if they are waiting for
> > > > > someone else to submit the pretty obvious revert?  Don't understand
> > > > > why that should take more than a minute to figure out.  It's not
> > > > > like they are testing these changes anyway...
> > > >
> > > <snip>
> > > >
> > > > What exact part (or parts) are we looking at (lspci|grep -i eth) that trigger
> > > this?  Could it be a difference in .config files?  The trace says it is falling back
> > > to legacy interrupts, does the system continue to work and does the
> > > network continue to function in that mode?  In case it's related to user space
> > > what is the base distro?  Any other information you think can help me
> > > reproduce the issue would be appreciated.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Config attached, the machine is a Thinkpad X61s 1.8Ghz with no onboard
> > > wireless devices (rtl8192cu usb wifi is used).
> > > 
> > > # lspci| grep -i eth
> > > 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82566MM Gigabit Network
> > > Connection (rev 03)
> > > 
> > > Debian jessie amd64 is the distro.
> > > 
> > > I'll have to get back to you on if the e1000e continues functioning, the
> > > machine continues to function until the shutdown panic.
> > > 
> > > There were however some occurrences of subsequent suspend/resume
> > > cycles hanging the machine hard leaving the display off, which prompted me
> > > to resume using
> > > 4.10 before digging any further as it's my only system right now.
> > > 
> > > Will try get around to testing 4.11 with 7e54d9d063fa reverted soon.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Vito Caputo
> 
> 
> This is still broken as of 4.11.0-rc3 FYI.
> 
> Upon resume:
> [   45.828344] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   45.828352] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 807 at drivers/pci/msi.c:1052 __pci_enable_msi_range+0x39c/0x3f0
> [   45.828355] CPU: 0 PID: 807 Comm: kworker/u4:29 Not tainted 4.11.0-rc3 #52
> [   45.828356] Hardware name: LENOVO 7668CTO/7668CTO, BIOS 7NETC2WW (2.22 ) 03/22/2011
> [   45.828360] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> [   45.828362] Call Trace:
> [   45.828366]  dump_stack+0x4d/0x72
> [   45.828369]  __warn+0xc7/0xf0
> [   45.828371]  warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x20
> [   45.828372]  __pci_enable_msi_range+0x39c/0x3f0
> [   45.828375]  ? e1000e_get_phy_info_igp+0x1c/0xf0
> [   45.828377]  pci_enable_msi+0x15/0x30
> [   45.828379]  e1000e_set_interrupt_capability+0xe0/0x130
> [   45.828381]  e1000e_pm_thaw+0x1d/0x50
> [   45.828383]  e1000e_pm_resume+0x20/0x30
> [   45.828386]  pci_pm_resume+0x5f/0x90
> [   45.828389]  dpm_run_callback+0x44/0x170
> [   45.828391]  ? pci_pm_thaw+0x90/0x90
> [   45.828393]  device_resume+0xce/0x1e0
> [   45.828395]  async_resume+0x18/0x40
> [   45.828396]  async_run_entry_fn+0x32/0xe0
> [   45.828399]  process_one_work+0x13b/0x3e0
> [   45.828400]  worker_thread+0x64/0x4a0
> [   45.828402]  kthread+0x10f/0x150
> [   45.828404]  ? process_one_work+0x3e0/0x3e0
> [   45.828406]  ? __kthread_create_on_node+0x150/0x150
> [   45.828409]  ret_from_fork+0x29/0x40
> [   45.828411] ---[ end trace 56fad2d83af13529 ]---
> [   45.828469] e1000e 0000:00:19.0 eth3: Failed to initialize MSI interrupts.  Falling back to legacy interrupts.
> [   45.835944] PM: resume of devices complete after 364.406 msecs
> [   45.836001] usb 2-1:1.0: rebind failed: -517
> [   45.836316] PM: Finishing wakeup.
> 

I never reported back on the results of reverting 7e54d9d063fa, it seems to fix
the problem on my machine as well.

Regards,
Vito Caputo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ